Sandwichman,

It's not often I get requests, so this deserves my concentration. Sorry for the delay in responding.

Your question involves the relationship (if any) between the lump of labor theory or as we like to say fallacy and the Jubilee principle from Leviticus. Also, the comment cited that the passage of the 1868 law for federal employees to work an 8 hour day, and if this could be a "Jubilee of Labor".

First, I should say that from the look of your blog (and your obsession with lump of labor"), that you probably are smarter than I, and certainly more engaged with "the lump". I am sure you will find this post disappointing.

Regarding the "lump". I find discussion of the lump in economic circles to be a bit obtuse. I think it better discussed in business theory and management. My way of thinking has "lump" as something to be defeated by clever managers like say...moral hazard. If we were to use a restaurant as a testing ground. The bus boy could assume that he will enjoy x number of tables per day to bus, and if paid by the hour should stretch out his time, as x is all he is going to produce. The clever manager, should show him that if table turnover is increased and the demand for dinning there variable, he can both produce more bussed tables, work more hours and contribute to the greater good of the restaurant and his co-workers financial well-being. Now if the table turnover rate is not variable, and the demand not variable (as in the case of an office building where the firm enjoys 100% market share and no one becomes impatient and leaves before seating), than the bus mans "lump" assumption is correct and his work is fixed.

My view of the economics in Leviticus is that God's (or the author's) view of a just society is one where every citizen is guaranteed a certain level subsistence and income by virtue of the continuance the land ownership his ancestors acquired in the past. The Jubilee just "resets" the beginning land title (as best it can) every so often, so that no single bad event (bad crop, poor debt service decision etc) can cause more than one generation to suffer. It should be noted that this principle was seldom followed, and the Jews were both scolded by profits and punished by God for their "greed" in not following both the Sabbath and Jubilee principles to the fullest extent.

I admit my understanding of the 8 hour day movement to be very limited, and my frailty hurts my ability to respond correctly (if there is a right answer). It appeared to me that the 8 hour movement was motivated by a desire both to have a better home life and to start the process of increasing wages. In fact much of the debate over the movement was whether or not the wage for 8 should be the same as the wage for 12 hours of labor. What we think about "lump" is largely irrelevant as it was not our motivation that fed the movement.

The comment cited that some said the success of the 8 hour movement would be a "Jubilee of labor" seems to point to a difference in understanding about the motivation and effect of a properly executed Jubilee between myself and the speaker cited. If he believed that the laborer would raise his standard of living closer to the robber barron's of the day with the adoption of the 8 hour day, we both know that that could'nt and didn't happen. The 8 hour Day did not change (appreciably) the capital accumulation of the working class, so there was not real gain made in class differentiation. Did the 8 hour day "reset" the class and wealth differences that the author(s) of Leviticus sought? I say no. So the "Jubilee of Labor" comment was way off, in my view.

My view of the 8 hour day movement is that it was the beginning of a more just view of the working class, and perhaps the start of a burgeoning middle class. This middle class, has its own importance in our History.

I would like to know your thoughts on these issues.

My Best,
Tom

Biblical Economic Principles, although adding stability, stifled incentives and hindered occupational freedom.

OK. I said it. This has been on my mind since I discovered the Jubilee principle a couple of years ago. But it doesn't stop at the debt forgiveness and freeing of slaves every fifty years. Jubilee also features the return of land to its original owners. Thus legally land cannot be sold, only its harvests purchased for a set period of time. There are many other principles included in a proper examination of Biblical economics, but we'll just consider Jubilee. If one needed funding and was close to the 50 year celebration, you would have been limited to the sale of X < years to jubilee of crop revenue. Keep in mind that in an agrarian society, (which all societies were not that long ago), land control was occupational control. If Grandpa was a grain farmer, your options to have a fine vineyard were limited.